Alcuni la dipingono come la battaglia di Apple contro Google. A me pare di più la battaglia di Google contro AT&T.
Filed under: Analysis / Opinion, Wireless, Bad Apple, iPhone, App Store
In the wake of TJ Luoma’s report earlier tonight that the two independent Google Voice applications have been removed from the App Store, Jason Kincaid at TechCrunch says that the official Google Voice app has also been given the shaft. He theorizes that, despite the official Apple line that the apps "duplicate features that come with the iPhone," the real reason the apps were removed was because of squawking from AT&T.
While TechCrunch doesn’t offer any definitive proof that AT&T is behind the Google Voice blockage, they do cite GV Mobile developer Sean Kovacs’ point that Phil Schiller himself, who you may remember from Apple events like Macworld ‘09 and WWDC, personally approved the GV Mobile app last April. In fact, Kovacs says that Schiller called him to apologize for the delays in getting the app approved.
Given that high-level support for the app, it’s not hard to follow TechCrunch’s logic and set sights on AT&T when looking for reasons for its removal. While few people would argue that Apple’s app approval process is pretty broken right now, it’s hard to believe that an application that was approved by Apple’s VP of marketing was somehow magically unapproved because it "duplicates functionality."
As TJ said in his post, it’s difficult to believe that Apple truly thinks users will be confused by an application that does the same thing as the built-in Phone app when they went out of their way to purchase and download it. Even setting that aside, it’s not at all clear exactly what functionality is supposedly being duplicated. If it’s the dialer, then that’s a poor excuse; lots of other approved apps include dialers, including Skype. If it’s the SMS functionality, again, poor excuse, as other apps provide SMS functionality as well.
It’s true that Google Voice isn’t necessarily as "scary" to AT&T as a true VoIP app like Skype, but some of the Google Voice functions that TechCrunch describes, like free SMS messages and cheaper long distance, certainly do sound like something that would rattle AT&T’s cage.
Take into consideration that Skype was approved because it will only work over Wi-Fi, even though there’s no technical reason it shouldn’t run over 3G. Look at how crippled SlingPlayer is compared to the same app on other phones. Now, Google Voice is dead in the water on the iPhone. What we have is a very clear and disturbing pattern. Applications that provide innovative solutions to users, but which fall outside the bounds of what a traditionally-minded telecommunications company like AT&T considers acceptable, are being either hobbled by arbitrary restrictions like Skype and Sling or blasted out of existence like Google Voice.
Whether it’s Apple’s fault or AT&T’s, it’s getting tiresome to see innovative applications like Skype or Google Voice constantly kicked to the curb or kneecapped. Are we headed for an App Store with nothing in it except fart apps? Those, at the very least, don’t duplicate any built-in iPhone functionality that I’ve heard of.
One more thing: who else thinks it’s ironic that a company started by a couple of guys who spent lots of time phone phreaking in a garage in the 1970s now kowtows to AT&T and kills apps that help people make cheaper calls?
TUAWIs AT&T behind the rejection and removal of Google Voice apps? originally appeared on The Unofficial Apple Weblog (TUAW) on Tue, 28 Jul 2009 00:45:00 EST. Please see our terms for use of feeds.
Read | Permalink | Email this | Comments
Theres bad news for AT&T in a recent customer satisfaction poll. Consumer Reports asked 50,000 readers across 26 U.S. cities to rank cell service providers on a variety of scales. Verizon came out ahead in 19 of the 26 cities. AT&T was dead last.
Bay Area iPhone users, relief is on the way: This morning, 